No place to study (except in the study area and everywhere else)
Wed Feb 24, 2010 00:35 (UTC -5)It’s student election time again. In the spring, we vote for Student Body President, Vice President, and Treasurer, along with representatives for freshmen, sophomores, colleges, and grad students. Sound exciting? Oh, it is.
At UF, one political party controls most of Student Government. It’s the party that all of the fraternities and sororities happen to support, and these days it’s known as the Unite Party. They always win.
There’s also one or several opposition parties. The past few semesters, there have been the Orange & Blue Party and the Progress Party, but after cannibalizing each other’s votes last semester, they’ve decided to (ahem) unite as the Student Alliance. Their presidential candidate is Ben Cavataro, whom I mentioned around this time last year. He used to represent my dorm in Student Government, and I have a high opinion of him.
One of the big issues this semester is the student union. The university wants to increase tuition so it can raise funds to expand the building. The majority party, which basically always does whatever the university administration wants, supports the plan. The issue is now on the ballot for students to vote on (albeit in a non-binding manner).
This week, I’ve seen official-looking signs posted in the student union that list so-called problems with the current building and the benefits of jacking up our tuition to fix them. One of the “problems” is that the building has “no place to study,” even though a large study area was just built about a year ago. Today (well, yesterday, since I’m writing this after midnight), I wrote a letter to a student newspaper expressing my outrage at the university for creating these signs with false statements.
Then I read today’s issue of the paper and found out that the signs had been created by a student-run campaign, not the university. Oops. By the time I was able to send a correction to the newspaper, they told me that my letter had already gone to press. Tomorrow, a lot of people might realize that I’m not technically right. Boo.
In my defense, the signs were misleading and were placed very prominently, as if the university had endorsed their message. In fact, that’s actually likely because I’ve never seen any other student group’s signs placed at the entrances of the building for all to see. As if that weren’t enough, some university departments actually have officially endorsed the campaign.
Also, my letter can pretty much be read as though I’m criticizing the university for allowing the signs to be put up, so all in all, I guess I’m still right. I just hope no one nitpicks.
Here’s an old video about how they make food look good for TV commercials. (Via The Presurfer)
This compact calendar is pretty clever. (Via Lifehacker)
I knew I’d seen this cliché in about a million TV shows and movies: Let’s Enhance. (Via waxy.org)

6 comments
#1 by Wendy: Wed Feb 24, 2010 07:44 (UTC -5)
If its a student run campaign FUNDED by the University, you were right Jordon.
#2 by Jordon Kalilich: Wed Feb 24, 2010 09:38 (UTC -5)
In fact, it is.
#3 by kevin: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:45 (UTC -5)
Stand up for what you believe in.
#4 by Ben Cavataro: Wed Mar 03, 2010 04:32 (UTC -5)
Just saw this – you’re exactly right!
- Ben Cavataro
#5 by Ben Cavataro: Wed Mar 03, 2010 04:38 (UTC -5)
In case you haven’t seen the follow up: Even after the Reitz referendum was defeated with 55% or more voting no, it seems they’re still determined to press forward:
http://www.gainesville.com/article/20100226/ARTICLES/100229582/-1/MAGAZINE?Title=Reitz-renovation-expansion-still-possible-
#6 by Jordon Kalilich: Wed Mar 03, 2010 07:54 (UTC -5)
Oh yes, I’ve been keeping up with that. I read your quote in yesterday’s Alligator article, and I totally agree; that’s no way to run a democracy.