« SATurday
Festival »

Stream of consciousness II

Wed Feb 01, 2006 18:51 (UTC -5)

I think I’ll try writing down my thoughts as they come once again, as in Stream of consciousness, a recent post of mine. There will be no backspacing of any kind while I write this, except to correct typos. (Apparently I also need to think about my sentences before writing them. That first one was horrendous.)

So it’s February, guys. Already. Tomorrow is Groundhog Day, Joyce‘s birthday, and Scotto‘s birthday, and February 2. Luke probably wouldn’t let me get away without mentioning that tomorrow is James Joyce’s birthday. Case in point: He’s been carrying around a copy of Ulysses and is planning on attending a reading of it after school tomorrow. They’ll probably use his copy, even.

This is going to be a difficult subject to discuss all in one shot, but I’ll try. I’m planning on asking out a girl to the Valentine’s Day Dance. No, she is not my secret crush (?), nor is she the lesbian, nor is she the girl I almost went out with. This is one girl that, in terms of liking, has been on my mind by far the longest. I’ve only mentioned her a scant few times in this blog over the two and a half years that I’ve known her because I couldn’t act on my feelings — she was seeing someone. I don’t know if she is now — she very well may be — but if she’s not, then I’ll tell you who she is (assuming, of course, that she accepts my offer; there are two conditions at work here: she has to be single, and she has to say yes. Otherwise, it’s a no-go, and I won’t tell. You don’t need to know about a failed crush, anyway.)

This is the way I see it: if she has a boyfriend already (which, if I haven’t mentioned it, is extremely likely), then the worst thing that can happen to me is that his opinion of me would probably drop a bit, if he knows me. On the other hand, if she is single and says yes to me, then, well, I have the world to gain. Potentially. It would be nice to act on these feelings I’ve had basically off and on for two and a half years. And maybe if she rejects me, then it can serve as some kind of closure. I guess all of you understand me when I talk about these things, as you have all done these things before. Well, the guys will understand, because they’re usually the ones who do the asking and stuff. The girls will probably laugh at how naive I am. The guys will too.

But you all have to understand that I love that feeling you get when you’re in love, sorta. I meant it when I had said I was the happiest guy in the world at one point. Another thing that makes me happy is that this site is currently the #1 result on Google for “happiest guy in the world” — without the quotes.

I wonder if this is how a lot of people write posts on LiveJournal — without thinking it through, I mean. Maybe that’s why so many LiveJournals are incomprehensibly bad. (I’m not talking about any of the nine LJs that I read regularly, of course. My friends and acquaintances all have the good sense to care about things like spelling and grammar. That’s why I like ‘em. Well, many of them do, anyway. Some of them. If you’re reading this, then probably you.)

Here’s an old (1946) documentary/propaganda-type film about despotism (Flash, sound).

How does your web site look on Apple’s Safari browser? Find out at SafariTest. This site was useful while I was redesigning The World of Stuff most recently.

One year ago: “If I were more able to express my emotions, I’d be hyperventilating or something.”


7 comments

#1 by Luke: Wed Feb 01, 2006 19:15 (UTC -5)

I hate to be stomping on your lofty view of this “reading,” but the story is much simpler than the one you present. See, I’ve been carrying around a copy of _Ulysses_ because I’ve been reading it not because Joyce’s birthday is tomorrow. This special afterschool deal is just going to be TJ and I (I’m not even sure why it showed up on the morning show). Thank you to everyone who volunteered to participate. That said, Dr Shipe now has his copy of the 1961 correction (the same one I have) in his classroom, and TJ is borrowing his 1984 (cough, cough) edition. I’m assuming all three will be used tomorrow, seeing as the group is fairly large… Wikipedia still hasn’t responded to my request that they use a quote of Joyce’s as the daily quote. Also: I win the short story competition (and assoc. cash) because no one else entered. Ha! I believe this is the first time a Joyce tribute has won that competition…

#2 by darkerday: Wed Feb 01, 2006 19:17 (UTC -5)

grammer realy makes it

#3 by Jordon: Wed Feb 01, 2006 19:39 (UTC -5)

I know you’ve been reading Ulysses. How else would I have found out that the middle part of the book is like a play, and that inanimate objects talk and sing?

It’s mysterious how the non-lofty “reading” ended up on the morning show and all. It would be funny if someone found out about it that way and decided to drop by. I mean, it would be interesting. Interesting.

#4 by Luke: Wed Feb 01, 2006 19:53 (UTC -5)

The last comment I did just disappeared. The sum of it was that anyone can show up to the semi-interesting deal tomorrow, and I found the singing soap passage (which was not as interesting the second time around):
THE SOAP:
We’re a capital couple are Bloom and I.
He brightens the earth. I polish the sky.

Hmm… SOMEone can borrow _Portrait_ when he finishes the book he’s reading. Hint, etc.

#5 by Scotto: Wed Feb 01, 2006 21:15 (UTC -5)

Thanks for the shout-out, and good luck on your coming romantic endeavors!

I suspect that you’re right about LJ’s Stream of consciousness nature.

#6 by kristen: Thu Feb 02, 2006 07:52 (UTC -5)

i agree with scotto. livejournal usually is stream-of-consciousness because everyone wants to be like holden caulfield in this “crumby” world. but there is an exception: several times, when something major happened to me, i would plan out how i’d write it [in my head, of course] so it would come out a little nicer than usually, but still pretty bad.

i’m using safari right now in dr. shipe’s class, ironically enough. i only use it because it’s faster than internet explorer at school.

#7 by Luke: Thu Feb 02, 2006 21:14 (UTC -5)

I must disagree with your theory that LiveJournal posts are stream of consciousness for the sole reason that those yahoos out in the hall don’t have consciousness.

Leave a Comment

Feel free to join in on the discussion of this post. Keep the following in mind:

  • Don't include links to your commercial web site, or your comment will be summarily deleted. Advertising is not allowed here, so don't waste your time.
  • You can enter your e-mail address if you'd like me to contact you via e-mail. It is never disclosed to anyone else.
  • You can use the following HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> . (Your line breaks will be converted automatically.)
  • Comments will generally be visible immediately. However, if your comment contains spam-like keywords or an unusual number of links, it will be subject to approval before appearing.


Follow the Discussion

Web feed icon Subscribe to the comment feed for this post.

« SATurday
Festival »

Get E-mail Updates

Sub­scribe now, get an e-mail for every new post. No spam, I pro­mise.

Recently on Twit­ter

“It's a beau­ti­ful day, and Kate is here!” (3 days ago)

Fol­low @the­world­of­stuff

RSS

Sub­scribe in your favor­ite reader.

Blog­roll

Stan­dards Com­pli­ance

This page con­sists of valid XHTML + RDFa with valid CSS 3.